-
IP only nodes with ICM flag
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 11 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 18 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 25 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Mar 4 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Mar 11 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Mar 18 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Mar 25 12:00:02 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Apr 8 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Apr 15 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Apr 22 12:00:06 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Apr 29 12:01:24 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Apr 29 12:25:46 2026
Hello All,
Wednesday April 29 2026 12:01, I wrote to you:
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
[..]
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN ,INA:46.63.89.115
Net 4624 is dead and has been dead for a couple of years. The listed telephone numbers all respond with a recorded message to the effect of "this number is not in use".
None of the listed IP connections answer to an attempt to connect via Binkp.
Since RC46 is obviously unable or unwilling to take the necessary steps I suggest that Ward removes net 4624 from the R46 segment before further processing.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)