-
IP only nodes with ICM flag
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 11 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 18 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Feb 25 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
-
From
Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to
All on Wed Mar 4 12:00:00 2026
Hello All,
The ICM flag was meant as a transition mechanism for accomodating nodes that were running CM for the IP part and non CM for the POTS/ISDN part.
See also: fts-5001.006 paragraph 5.11. Flag Redundancies.
The CM flag implies ICM: ICM should not be used unless CM is impossible.
So IP only nodes should carry the CM flag, not the ICM flag.
This is a list of nodes with a misplaced ICM flag:
,110,Seans_Elist_Maintainer,Johnson_City_TN_USA,Sean_Dennis,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,XX,INA:bbs.outpostbbs.net,IBN,IFC,IFT,ITN:60177,PING,TRACE
,666,PlanStation,Khmelnitsky,Vova_Dmitrishin,-Unpublished-,300,ICM,IBN,INA:46.63.89.115
2 lines match
--- Ftoolsw32 post
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)